“There is no ocular evidence to show that Muhammad Abbas was murdered by any in the present petitioners. Mere fact that Noor Muhammad and Muhammad Din observed firstly the deceased and after a ways they saw the petitioners going towards the same direction, didn't necessarily mean that the petitioners were chasing the deceased or were accompanying him. This sort of evidence cannot be treated as evidence of past witnessed.
The court emphasized that in cases of intentional murder, the gravity in the offense demands the most stringent punishment, thinking of the sanctity of human life and deterrence for likely offenders.
Therefore, this petition is found to become not maintainable and is also dismissed along with the pending application(s), along with the petitioners may perhaps seek remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
To report technical problems with our Website, please contact the webmaster. The webmaster will not reply to inquiries seeking legal assistance or specific cases. Questions regarding specific cases should be directed for the court in which the case has been or will be filed.
94 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It's very well-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within 90 times. If your appeal is just not decided within that timeframe, he/she will then approach the service tribunal to challenge the initial order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, given that the ninety times for the department to act has already expired. On the aforesaid proposition, we're guided through the decision from the Supreme Court in the case of Dr.
The presiding judge emphasized the need to address the evolving techniques used by counterfeiters, noting that the amendment’s inclusion of technological facets allows for a more comprehensive legal reaction.
If a sufferer is shot at point-blank vary, it might still be fair to infer that the accused supposed death. However, that is not always the case.
Any court may seek to distinguish the present case from that of the binding precedent, to achieve a different conclusion. The validity of such a distinction might or might not be accepted on appeal of that judgment to your higher court.
This ruling has conditions, and Considering that the petitioners failed a qualifying Test, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based on the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above mentioned facts and circumstances of your case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 on the Constitution. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble click here Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-223999 Tag:Offered the legal analysis on the topic issue, we're of your view that the claim of the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Original contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle is not really legally sound, In addition to promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, These are topic to rules and regulations Should the recruitment rules of the subject post permit the case with the petitioners for promotion may very well be thought of, however, we are apparent inside our point of view that contractual service cannot be considered for seniority and promotion as being the seniority is reckoned from the date of regular appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum fitness, matter to availability of vacancy issue towards the approval on the competent authority.
Using keywords effectively is also very important. Think about using synonyms and variations of your keywords to ensure you capture all relevant results. Understanding the citation system used by Pakistani courts will also help you pinpoint specific cases.
Whoever, with the intention of causing death OR with the intention of causing bodily injury to the person, by doing an act which within the ordinary course of nature is likely to cause death, or with the knowledge that his act is so imminently harmful that it must in all probability cause death, causes the death in the such person, is said to commit qatl-i-amd/murder”
The latest amendment to this section signifies the legislature’s dedication to maximizing the effectiveness on the legislation in tackling contemporary challenges related to counterfeiting.
These judicial interpretations are distinguished from statutory legislation, which are codes enacted by legislative bodies, and regulatory law, which are recognized by executive companies based on statutes.